Juan Williams. every one else has an opinion, so . . .
#1
Posted 25 October 2010 - 09:03 AM
http://news.yahoo.co...illion-contract
(there was a really good recap in yahoo news the day after, but I can't find it now)
So, the Juan Williams goes on foxnews as the token liberal, and--taken out of context--says a really dumb thing . . . maybe on purpose to cause all this jibbajab.
Gets fired, waaaaaay too off the cuff.
Now he's a hero . . . to . . . some demographic apparently.
At the very least he made NPR look like the right's worst left-wing stereotype/chiche.
#2
Posted 25 October 2010 - 09:12 AM
but basically I agree with the folks that say Williams lost track of the difference between analyst vs commentator. he'd been slipping further and further from NPR standards and closer and closer to the Fox norm (if on O'Reily, say something obnoxious) for quite awhile. this particular incident wouldn't have justified dismissal, except that it provided an excuse for NPR to act on what's been a bigger pattern.
#3
Posted 25 October 2010 - 09:12 AM
Temporary forum for Azpunk.com message board folks = www.azpwithdrawal.com
#4
Posted 25 October 2010 - 09:43 AM
I think both sides get to blow this out of proportion and six months from now no one will remember it.
#5
Posted 25 October 2010 - 09:44 AM
I really liked Juan Williams on NPR, and was baffled when I found out he had a semi regular presence on FOX. I agree that it went down pretty shitty, but he did have it coming if he had been warned multiple times before for the same thing.
I have more respect for NPR on trying to keep things on the right track. It irks me to hear them called Leftwing media by representatives of Fox News, especially when Fox news should just be called Fox Entertainment.
Message board?
This is The Shizz.
Chromelodeon manages to get all the furniture from their hotel into the lake a few years back...and people are worried about shizzies?
#6
Posted 25 October 2010 - 10:40 AM
My favorite:
I'm not so into froofy skirts usually, but I would so wear that if the occasion were right.
#7 Guest_arise_shine_*
Posted 25 October 2010 - 10:53 AM
Of course the whole thing sucks, because there's a national conversation that needs to take place. A LOT of Americans have been conditioned (intentionally or not) to see Muslims as potential terrorists. Myself included! And I'm all for racial/religious equality and non-discrimination. But when the media fires SO much terrorism at you, and the vast majority of them are Middle-Eastern brown people with head-wraps shouting about Allah. It's GOTTA have an effect.
But now we can't have the conversation, because (as typical) the extremists on both sides have turned it into another fucking polarizing issue. Same exact thing as Dr. Laura and the N-word. A great opportunity for a conversation ruined by political histrionics.
I'm gonna go burn an American flag now.
#8
Posted 25 October 2010 - 12:39 PM
It seems odd to me on one hand, but I do understand not wanting one of your reporters to go around spouting off opinions either (how those opinions can be seen to cast shadow over objective news reporting).
However, if you're going to let someone provide analysis on other networks, personal opinions are going to factor into that no matter how much you don't even mean for it to--esp when people like Orielly turn everything into a personal argument, and work to gode one out of their guests.
I like Williams on NPR too, and truthfully I didn't mind is personal statement.
It felt honest, and in the larger context made lots of sense.
I think a lot of people would--if being honest--admit to having the same initial gut reaction.
NPR on the other had really bungled this, made themselves look like intolerant ideologuesvery much the flipside of the FOX coin.
. . . somewhere, the cynical conspiratorial minion in my mind cant help but feel this whole little thing was somehow scripted by everyone involved.
Also: pink docs = cool. Giant single pink dot = weird.
#9
Posted 25 October 2010 - 02:00 PM
keep FOX and NPR away from me. they both make me want to sock myself one right in the ole kisser
AND i will also say that no matter how far left i am, and how much i think racial bias is fucked on every conceivable level, i personally dont get excited when i see middle easterners on my plane. you may say im a victim of the media, you may think im a bigot, but im just being honest. i bear no ill will towards anyone of any different creed or nationality but when you look at the statistics of airplane related terror/hijackings/etc you cant say im not looking at the numbers.
i dont trust white people when im on the street either. mainly because im still looking at numbers: i dont expect some Pakistani homeless guy to try to shank me: i expect the grizzled ass white dude. so suck it.
#10
Posted 25 October 2010 - 02:16 PM
#11
Posted 25 October 2010 - 02:21 PM
i dont say this simply to be contrarian or smart ass (moreso to say that, for me, it doesnt change the way i thought about NPR at all), i do not care in any way about this. i actually cant stand a lot of NPR simply because it is often the spineless douchey liberal cariacture that makes left leeaning people seem like a bunch of weiners.
keep FOX and NPR away from me. they both make me want to sock myself one right in the ole kisser
I am not sure how NPR is spineless and douchey, could you elaborate? It won't change my view, but I would like to understand why you think this so I maybe get a better idea of where this mindset comes.
Message board?
This is The Shizz.
Chromelodeon manages to get all the furniture from their hotel into the lake a few years back...and people are worried about shizzies?
#12
Posted 25 October 2010 - 02:40 PM
there is at least real news on NPR, which i support, but it seems like everytime someone turns it on its the epitome of upper class liberal crap. ie: lets shop at green stores and drive prius and pretend its going to save everything.
#13
Posted 25 October 2010 - 03:18 PM
i said OFTEN spineless and douchey, and if you like it, thats fine. if you dont see how thats self explanatory, then thats fine too. every time i hear NPR its some soft voiced borderline whiny person talking about the most uninteresting thing i can think of. or WAIT, WAIT where everyone just sounds like a smart ass, and not in the funny way.
there is at least real news on NPR, which i support, but it seems like everytime someone turns it on its the epitome of upper class liberal crap. ie: lets shop at green stores and drive prius and pretend its going to save everything.
fair enough
I guess there is a guy with kind of a lisp or hair lip who occasionally reports on there, and Diane Rheem(spelling?) can be a little painful to listen to at first, but the content of her show has always been cool with me. Other than that, I never considered anyone on there whiny. I don't really listen on the weekends so I don't really listen to this American Life. They aren't yelling at the audience, like some other stations do, so I can understand how you could take it as soft voiced.
I guess I don't need people yelling at me to give me the news. I also DON'T want opinions when I get the news, I only want the facts. Side comments can be ok if it's non-political. I read that CNN is losing ratings because they aren't opinionated like FOX news which I think is lame.
I like spineless and douchey News and I have no issues with that as long as I get my facts.
Message board?
This is The Shizz.
Chromelodeon manages to get all the furniture from their hotel into the lake a few years back...and people are worried about shizzies?
#14
Posted 25 October 2010 - 03:24 PM
it seems like everytime someone turns it on its the epitome of upper class liberal crap
I generally like listening to NPR, but I have to second this. It's the douchey lifestyle pieces that assume that the listener has a zillion dollars and wants to hear about fashion and cars and $80 cuts of meat from upscale butcher shops. What about us liberals that make $23,000 a year? Huh? I don't want to hear some numbnuts blather on about what wine to drink while you're watching a DVD of Eat Pray Love.
It's not as bad as the NY Times or anything, which just ran an article about rich New York assholes giving their babies iPhones:
THE bedroom door opened and a light went on, signaling an end to nap time. The toddler, tousle-haired and sleepy-eyed, clambered to a wobbly stand in his crib. He smiled, reached out to his father, and uttered what is fast becoming the cry of his generation: “iPhone!”
Because there's no toddlers in this generation whose parents either can't afford an iPhone, or know better than to hand it to a 2-year old. FUCK YOU, New York Times.
#15
Posted 25 October 2010 - 03:24 PM
no, im saying that the news segments i am fine with-thats what news SHOULD be like. its everything else on there that is just so annoyingly fey.fair enough
I guess there is a guy with kind of a lisp or hair lip who occasionally reports on there, and Diane Rheem(spelling?) can be a little painful to listen to at first, but the content of her show has always been cool with me. Other than that, I never considered anyone on there whiny. I don't really listen on the weekends so I don't really listen to this American Life. They aren't yelling at the audience, like some other stations do, so I can understand how you could take it as soft voiced.
I guess I don't need people yelling at me to give me the news. I also DON'T want opinions when I get the news, I only want the facts. Side comments can be ok if it's non-political. I read that CNN is losing ratings because they aren't opinionated like FOX news which I think is lame.
I like spineless and douchey News and I have no issues with that as long as I get my facts.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users