RustyShackleford

I think she gets stuck on a talking point and will attach any incoming information to it. That or the long blink she does is her brain rebooting.

Like Karl Pilkington says "If you just talk, your mouth comes up with stuff."

Partners in Crime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJYd7YQYvVI

First Recording
New Demos

This and the baking episode have me cracking up.

Hi we're pretty new, but our first release is finally ready and up on bandcamp.
I didn't think it would be so hard to mix just guitar and drums.

Come Hear

Some of these are pretty amazing.

http://www.boston.co...ee_protest.html

Assange says that governments need to keep some things secret. (below at about 8mins).
My point is that they are not just releasing things without consideration of the content. There is a journalistic intent and attempts made to redact sensitive information about agents in the field. They have even offered to have the US help redact names and sensitive details.

The rape charge just muddies the water and affects the media coverage of the actual revelations about what the world's governments are up. Almost every story about the leaks makes some reference to it.

!

I don't really see how a public case against this guy for rape means the "secret police" are after him.

Just because the guys pissed off the government does not mean he can't also be a scumbag.

Frankly I find his claim that everything he released falls under "freedom of the press" comparable to the Westboro Baptist Church's claim that harassing people at funerals falls under "freedom of speech".

The Swedish authorities were not going to charge him and said he wasn't a suspect then changed their mind and reopened the case. It's sounds suspicious to me, not that it can't be true.

And there is alot of evidence of our govt, putting immense pressure on others to bend their legal system to our will.

Here's one from the recently released leaks
Cables: U.S. Tried to Thwart Spanish Probes; U.K. Assured Bush Admin over Iraq Inquiry

from democracy now:
http://www.democracy...al_murder_video

Revelations continue to emerge from the massive trove of diplomatic cables released by the whisteblower website WikiLeaks. The latest disclosures reveal U.S. officials tried to influence Spanish prosecutors and government officials to drop court investigations into torture at Guantánamo Bay, CIA extraordinary rendition flights, and the 2003 killing of a Spanish journalist by U.S. troops in Iraq. The documents also show the Bush administration was assured they would be shielded from scrutiny at British government inquiry into the Iraq war.

Two months before the Chilcot inquiry opened in November 2009, the U.S. embassy in London reported that a top British official had vowed Britain would "put measures in place to protect [U.S.] interests" during the proceedings. The British official was quoted saying that while the Iraq war seemed no longer to be a major issue in the United States, he predicted there would be a "feeding frenzy" once the inquiry began.

That of Montreal show was crazy.

Al Roker's costume was way better than mine this year.
So here you go

Crying baby.

really?

i guess i'd be okay with somebody calling the cops because they thought a baby was crying so much because they were being abused or something, but if the baby was just crying too loud? if i was a cop i'd punch that person in the face, because then i'm out ticketing babies instead of doing my real job: arresting mexicans.

What if the baby was mexican? A good officer always checks papers, baby or not.