Posted 14 May 2010 - 04:35 PM
i am interested in reading JP's book because i (as, i assume many of us did) came from the same scene/environment he did and a lot of us are all doing similar things.
so he scored himself a book deal and wrote a book about his life. that's what writing is. just because it's framed as a memoir, doesn't make it any less work than writing any other work. give the dude some props. if you think it's easy, give it a shot, and see if you can sell it. or, if you're too cool, put it out yourself. i'll read it.
jp could've framed his book like brian peterson, (burning fight: the 90s hardcore revolution) but he chose to do it more first person style. so what? i've seen some of jp's writing, and he can write. whether it's a good book or not, i have no idea. but unless you've read it, who cares about your opinion?
sarah palin is interesting and polarizing. assface donald rumsfeld is interesting and polarizing. jp (and his music) is interesting and polarizing. with all the schlock bullshit that's out there, why would you criticize him for writing something that is a historical document of a scene that deserves documenting because he's the documenter?
i smell a little jealousy on the board today.