185 replies to this topic

[rudolpho of pensacola]

yeah, except not everyone on here
lives in arizona, so...not pointless
at all. plus since when has debate
or conversation ever been pointless?

ohhhh
you know what i meant when i said it was pointless

maybe a better word is ironic
it is pretty damn funny

are you ging to vote now?

[aaronburke]

yes, i'm going to vote for nader.

[rudolpho of pensacola]

well, if all the things that are in that
article are true, then he shouldn't be
on the ballot...

who really knows how much of that is true?
i don't
all i know is that the dem's are out to get him
and are probably willing to go to great lengths to bring him down

[aaronburke]

yeah, i certainly don't know if it's true
or not, but what i'm saying is if it's
true, then he shouldn't be on the ballot...
i'm still voting though.

[rudolpho of pensacola]

that's good
i know there was a few people here that said if nader was not on the ballot that they would not vote

how does voting for nader work now?
is it a write-in?
where does your vote go(how does voting for nader count if he is not on the ballot) ?

[mothrock]

I bet nader had no clue that was going on, either that, or it is totally made up just to get him off the ballot.

[/Mr DNA/]

yes, i'm also going to vote for nader.

on an oregon absentee ballot.

oregon is another swing state, and one where a nader vote will have much more impact than arizona.



if our choices are being restricted, how far removed is the restriction of our votes in general?

[/Mr DNA/]

Mr DNA

a message from the Devolutionary party of america candidate to the democrats and republicans:
you think its funny, but what i say is true. the reason that we live like this is all because of you!

DUTY NOW FOR THE FUTURE!

[rudolpho of pensacola]

self-righteous pooping machine

[bobby]

That's pretty embarassing. This whole system sucks.
Money.

[dharma_bum]

what was nader's stance on 1st amendment rights?? would he have voted in favor of the indecency bill?? kerry voted for it.

[mikemfer]

Hey guys. Sorry to inform, but all this argument is in vein.

http://www.azcentral...coverstory.html

Nader's not even going to be on Arizona's ballot in November.

That's OK, I would be voting Libertarian anyway:

this entire thread was pointless
HAHAHAHAHAHA

I was at lunch with woodman today and he said "Why do people keep posting on that thread? They've stated their opinion and so has everybody else. What's the point to going on? You're not going to convince anybody to change their mind." I thought about that for a minute, but I think it is good to debate stuff like this. Some of us will never change our minds, no matter what. Then again, I know when I'm wrong, and if I was proven wrong it would be a new insight to me. So at that point I would use the new information to look at things from a different of view. And just because nobody has posted that they've changed their mind because of this thread, who cares? They wouldn't necessarily post that anyway.

This kind of healthy debate is what our founding fathers had in mind. Voting for the lesser of two evils, however, was not.

[mothrock]

I've changed my mind.

[mikemfer]