The Debate
#31 Guest_johnny5_*
Posted 02 October 2004 - 12:40 PM
...uh, shit. Are there any other choices?
#32
Posted 02 October 2004 - 01:56 PM
and let's remember, the world is fucked up, because people are fucked up....
"Real love amounts to withholding the truth, even when you're offered the perfect opportunity to hurt someone's feelings." - DS
"one persons harassment, is just another person trying to get there shit back, ever think-a that?"
"THIS JUST IN: SHANE KENNEDY LIKES NOTHING.
SHOCKER." - Mig50
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." ~Dr. Seuss
#33
Posted 02 October 2004 - 11:15 PM
HAHAHAI hate Rich White People!
...uh, shit. Are there any other choices?
no
HAHAHA
no.
#34
Posted 04 October 2004 - 09:48 AM
people watching the debate thought kennedy won hands down, as he was calm collect and had stage presence
nixon on the other hand was sweating all over the place and looked shifty
people listening to the debate on the radio felt nixon won the debate, as his answers were more concise and stonger.
I think that it was the first debate to be broadcast on live tv, I may be wrong
do you think that listening rather then viewing these current debates would make a difference in your opinion, well knowing that most poeple here, it won't but what about other undecided folk out there in the heart land?
-trunkspaceAll the time when I tell people what I do they say, "Oh I don't understand art, I can't even draw." (or worse, "I only like art I can understand.") Well, ya know what, I don't know how to make a car, but I sure appreciate being able to drive one.
#35
Posted 04 October 2004 - 10:14 AM
I know the idea is that the debates are a big swing in the decision making process, but I think even most people who call themselves undecided tend to lean one way or the other, and will find evidence that supports their view and ignore evidence that doesn't. Just look at the media's reaction versus the reactions to the debate on this board.
#36
Posted 04 October 2004 - 10:40 AM
#37
Posted 04 October 2004 - 10:47 AM
Knight's Wake
https://knightswake....mp.com/releases
And other stuff:
http://jamesmileshq.bandcamp.com/
Record label: https://www.facebook.com/soursymphony
#38
Posted 04 October 2004 - 10:53 AM
Does anyone know these people? I always hear this, but I don't think I've ever met one. I seem to only meet the people Mike is talking about and people that just don't care or get really uncomfortable even discussing the issue at all.actually, believe it or not, around 19% of the polled undecided voters say that they could change their minds at this point (???) and 69% of these people say these debates could cinch it for them.
#39
Posted 04 October 2004 - 12:05 PM
and whats more is that in my hood, we have all these lawn advertisments, and i keep thinking, will these actually sway people, do people actually think it will sway people.
then you have the feuding neighbors who are trying to out do each other with how many signs they can put up. arggh
enough already
-trunkspaceAll the time when I tell people what I do they say, "Oh I don't understand art, I can't even draw." (or worse, "I only like art I can understand.") Well, ya know what, I don't know how to make a car, but I sure appreciate being able to drive one.
#40
Posted 04 October 2004 - 12:10 PM
#41
Posted 04 October 2004 - 12:30 PM
My dad, however, has a nice Kerry sign in his lawn.
MINIBOSSIES NEVAR SAY DIE!
Good-Evil.net
'the smuggest amongst us will always be the quickest to point out the most minor transgressions of others around them'- a quote i just made up and put quotes around to make it seem slightly fancier
#42
Posted 04 October 2004 - 12:40 PM
-trunkspaceAll the time when I tell people what I do they say, "Oh I don't understand art, I can't even draw." (or worse, "I only like art I can understand.") Well, ya know what, I don't know how to make a car, but I sure appreciate being able to drive one.
#43
Posted 05 October 2004 - 09:09 AM
So in other words, reading that statement and doing the math:actually, believe it or not, around 19% of the polled undecided voters say that they could change their minds at this point (???) and 69% of these people say these debates could cinch it for them.
First, that only refers to "undecided" voters, which looking at the polls tends to be about 4% of all voters.
So 19% of 4%, or about 0.8% of voters say the debates could outright 'change their minds'.
But wait a minute, if they are undecided, then how exactly would they change their minds? Obviously they are leaning in one direction or the other anyway, like I speculated above.
69% of the 4% say the debates could clinch it for them. Again, they are leaning one way or the other anyway. So about 3% of the voting public are looking for the debates to reaffirm views they already suspect they have.
What that means to me is that out of every 500 voters, 4 might actually change their positions because of the debates. Wow.
and whats more is that in my hood, we have all these lawn advertisments, and i keep thinking, will these actually sway people, do people actually think it will sway people.
I live near Kyrene and Guadalupe and on the SW corner there is a big vacant lot, big enough for a shopping center with a grocery store or whatever, but it's just a dirt lot. There is a Circle K on that corner and I can walk there in about 3 minutes. Needless to say I've walked there a time or two. Around this time of year every idiot candidate posts their signs, and they're all the same. First name in tiny letters. Last name in big letters. Red, white, and blue color scheme. No indication of the candidate's position on anything. Then there are signs like "Yes on 400". It's like, thanks for telling me what proposition 400 is by the way. Anyway, I think they are really unsightly, and like Chad says, do they really think those signs will change my mind? The notion insults me that they think by putting some goofy-looking middle-aged bozo on a sign with an American flag shirt on they are going to influence me.
I don't think those signs do shit other than pollute the landscape. I use to fantasize about forming an environmental group that would go around and collect political signs and throw them in the trash. After all, what's the difference between a burrito wrapper and a political sign? Both are a scrap of paper sitting in a vacant lot if you ask me. So anyway, I was thinking I could get a group of people together to "clean up Tempe". And you know what I found out? It's actually illegal to take those signs down. Weird.
#44 Guest_johnMFer_*
Posted 05 October 2004 - 09:29 AM
Heh, not so strange. If you were in office and had spent all that money on those signs, wouldn't you pass a law saying it was illegal to take them down? It's a totally self-serving law for politicians, the kind they LOVE to pass. It's kind of like voting yourself a pay raise, or giving the weathiest 1% of Americans a massive tax cut when you're a part of the weathiest 1%.And you know what I found out? It's actually illegal to take those signs down. Weird.
#45
Posted 05 October 2004 - 10:39 AM
giving the weathiest 1% of Americans a massive tax cut when you're a part of the weathiest 1%
Please explain to me how the tax cut disproportionally favored the rich. I know they got more money back. They were paying more money in, too, and they still do.
Let's see the math brutha.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users